« Weekend Link Roundup (March 17-18, 2012) | Main | Three Essentials for Accelerating Funder Collaboration »

Emotion and the Search for Meaning at SXSW

March 19, 2012

(Thaler Pekar is a regular contributor to PhilanTopic. In her last post, she wrote about your "T-shape" and how paying attention to it can help you collaborate.)

Sxsw_interactive_logoI just returned from the South by Southwest Interactive conference (SXSW), where I participated in a panel on applying story and narrative in organizations. I went to SXSW looking to explore my contention that, in an increasingly loud, complex, and data-saturated world, a smart leader's role is not to add more information but to communicate meaning. That certainly was the subtext of a fascinating discussion I sat in on titled "Maps of Time: Data as Narrative."

During the discussion, Burt Herman, co-founder of Storify, the popular social media curation tool, argued that because "every story is not perfectly understood in the moment," the use of algorithms to mine user data is a perfectly legitimate way to help people decide what's important. Pushing back a bit on Herman's point, Jenn Thom, a research scientist at IBM's Visual Communication Lab, noted that "the algorithms we create to sift through data are not apolitical." And Drew Harry, Ph.D. candidate at the MIT Media Lab, presented a program he is developing that helps people decide in real time what is and isn't important.

But it was panelist Nicola Hughes, a Knight-Mozilla Fellow, who said something that really electrified me, perfectly capturing what in my opinion was the real theme of this year's SXSW Interactive conference: that true social and technological innovation requires the marriage of offline and online activities, the combination of the digital and the human. Hughes noted that when people are trying to make sense of news in the moment -- think of trending stories on Twitter -- "untruths can travel far." Is sense-making then, true to what actually happened or why it happened? And, she added by way of warning, because all of us are producing and being exposed to a lot more of "It" (data, news, and information in narrative form), "we're going to be getting 'It' wrong more often."

In a conversation after the panel discussion, Hughes told me that "journalists will be the archeologists of the future. They will have to sift through big data to try to make sense of it all." I then shared with her my belief that there are always four stories: the story you tell; the story you hear; the story that is the truth; and the story you are not hearing. Nicola explained that, in the technological realm, the fourth story is referred to as "unknown knowledge."

The exchange was indicative of the undercurrent of "meaning-making" that ran through this year's conference. In addition to many panels on the use of technology for social good, there was a focus on what "Buddhist Geek" Vincent Horn calls the "collectivization of intent." Indeed, during a panel discussion titled "Closer to One: Buddhism and the Internet of Things," Matt Rolandson, of the design company Ammunition Group, asked the important question: "Now that anything is possible, what is worth making possible? What is meaningful?"

David Womack, creative director of interactive design at R/GA and a professor at the School of Visual and Performing Arts, led an equally compelling session titled "Does Your Product Have a Plot?" During the session, Womack stressed the importance of adding emotional complexity to product design so as to foster deeper customer engagement. I understood him in part to be saying that we all must demonstrate a deep regard for our customers and partners, that people are highly complex and emotional, and that it is a sign of respect to offer them content that emphathetically reflects this complexity.

The goal, said Womack, is emotional rather than product complexity, and he provided several examples to illustrate his point:

  • Amazon adding product reviews and, more recently, social sharing. According to Womack, Amazon is okay with a certain level of customer confusion because it keeps people coming back to the site, improving the odds they'll eventually buy something. As for negative product reviews, don't sweat 'em. Even if people are sharing negative stories about your product, said Womack, they are contributing complexity to the system, which serves to keep others interested.
  • The Tiffany Love Stories campaign, which Womack designed. Prior to the campaign, Tiffany didn't know whether people would be willing to share highly emotional stories of falling in love. But today, there are more than forty thousand such stories on the site. Why? Because, said Womack, by adding photos and then video, Tiffany ratcheted up the emotional complexity of the campaign, which kept people more engaged.
  • And, finally, Apple -- because, said Womack, they infuse technologically complex products with emotion (think of the blinking, "breathing" on/off light on a Mac), which helps to make them seem less complex.

In closing, Womack delivered two statements with relevance for the nonprofit sector: "Products that provide a platform for stories will be the ones that stick around." And, "We are lucky enough to live in complicated and interesting times for storytelling."

I also caught a terrifically funny and compassionate workshop by veteran character actor Jeffrey Tambor (The Larry Sanders Show, Arrested Development). In it, Tambor, while coaching a young acting student, managed to perfectly capture the importance of fully embracing emotional complexity and offering meaning to one's audience:

Tambor: "Have you ever been so mad that you jumped up and down?"

Student: "Probably."

Tambor: "What the f*ck?! Don't think. Just say, 'Yes!'"

Exactly! We are all more effective as communicators when we honestly embrace emotion and offer meaning to our audiences.

-- Thaler Pekar

« Previous post    Next post »


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Posted by Gabi  |   March 20, 2012 at 04:19 PM

Thank you for this summary Thaler! This describes perfectly the challenge (and by extension the opportunity) we face in gaining access to so much data. How do we make it relevant to people and how do we do so in ways that actually cultivate curiosity about what you describe as stories #3 and #4 (what the true story is and what story we aren't yet hearing).

I also think Jenn Hamm's comment about algorithms being anything but apolitical is dead on and worth repeating! I venture to guess that one of the reasons we like cool data analysis (especially in the third sector) is because it at least appears apolitical. In order to become storytellers and meaning makers we have to take more obvious risks and maybe even take a position on the causes we describe :)

Anyhow, thanks for sharing what you gathered. It is much appreciated by those of us who weren't in attendance.


Posted by Thaler Pekar  |   March 27, 2012 at 09:44 AM

Thank you so much for commenting, Gabi. I love your concept of "cultivating curiosity". (So much more meaningful than "curation"...) And your call for risk taking and meaning making in the third sector.

Come with me next year!

Posted by Thaler Pekar  |   April 04, 2012 at 09:50 AM

Nicola Hughes has posted her SXSW presentation on her blog: http://datamineruk.com/2012/04/03/data-journalism-and-the-problem-of-narrativity/

Posted by Mimian  |   April 23, 2012 at 02:37 PM

That's one of the hardest things to do as an actor--to just stop thinking and DO. My college acting prof. always said, ad-nauseum: "Acting is doing." Much like life (or what it should be). Thinking is all well and good, but eventually we need to take action, and our stories need to inspire people to take action. Thanks for the SXSW update, Thaler. Wish I could've been there!

The comments to this entry are closed.

Quote of the Week

  • "[L]et me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is...fear itself — nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance...."

    — Franklin D. Roosevelt, 32nd president of the United States

Subscribe to PhilanTopic


Guest Contributors

  • Laura Cronin
  • Derrick Feldmann
  • Thaler Pekar
  • Kathryn Pyle
  • Nick Scott
  • Allison Shirk

Tweets from @PNDBLOG

Follow us »

Filter posts